Hand Tools

Subject:
Re: I'm back to what is the objective

Brian Holcombe
A great deal of it can be mechanized, I really have little qualms with this so long as quality is maintained. After all, I think modern life would be nearly impossible without machines and the benefit of that in good cases is that you can get quality products that are reasonably priced.

Consider the CH24 chair, truly a masterpiece of industrialized fine woodworking. Wegner worked out the prototype painstakingly, having designed and built it by hand many times until he felt it was ready to be produced, then worked with the shop until the shop was capable of producing top quality work quickly and effectively. The chair features a steam bent back rail, curved lamination support for the back, perfectly straight grained lumber, cut tenons and a hand woven seat...for $550.

I think in scenarios like this where the details are so thoroughly thought-of and a master cabinetmaker with training in architecture was employed to put it together, then it becomes a huge benefit and allows many many people who would otherwise not be capable of doing to enjoy good design and quality make.

I like handwork for different purpose, I find it both practical and awe inspiring. I'm able to produce what I consider to be high quality furniture in a limited space. To do the same thing with machines would require me to practically rent a warehouse space and buy some top quality european tools along with probably CNC equipment and even then I would still be using hand tools. They have not really been eliminated from top work, even in production scenarios.

CNC is really only so accurate and it does not leave a quality surface finish aside from the fact that it would be without tearout. So the parts must be further refined from that point and shops are typically employing skilled labor for that aspect of the work.

Messages In This Thread

What makes the "handtool" look?
What is the objective
Re: I don't really know
If you can't design then copy
Re: That is a line...
Re: If you can't design then copy
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Edit: incomplete thought.
Chamfers on rails and styles
comment
This is a line of thought often
Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Adam's goal, as expressed to me
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: comment
Re: comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Disagree
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment
printing..
Re: comment
I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm wondering ...
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Not what I see *PIC*
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment (touchy feely alert)
ditto for turning
Re: Tempted
Re: Tempted
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Easy question
Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
A Riff on Derek's ideas
Re: we do it for ourselves
Re: we do it for ourselves - Nietzsche nailed it
Thanks Todd. *NM*
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Amish
Saw handles
Re: Saw handles
Easy... the eye of the beholder
You guys are way too negative
Perhaps...
Re: Perhaps...
Re: What makes the "handtool" look? Mistakes?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Thanks gentleman
Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Where was "why bother"?
What doesn't result in a hand tool look *PIC*
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Affectation Vs. Artifact
Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Affectation Vs. Artifact
You said it well *NM*
Sorry, didn't read your post very well
David Pye's thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts
Further thoughts
Re: Further thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts - Just not true though
Visual vs. measurement
ICBM gyros
Pye
Confusion
Re: Confusion
© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081