Hand Tools

Subject:
Re: comment
Response To:
Re: comment ()

Derek Cohen (in Perth, Australia)
Hi Kees

Still with my devils hat on ... :)

Do you know for a fact that the Gramercy handles are made on a CNC machine? (I do not know, but have a vague memory of Joel mentioning to me at one time that production stalled as their handle maker was incapacitated - I could be quite wrong). The point I want to make is that some saws may have simple features because they are intended to create a particular style. In which case, the Gramercy may not be a good example.

I understand what you are saying, nevertheless, and I agree with your sentiments.

Here are two saws made by George Wilson. I think they are inspirational (they inspired me with a handle, below) ...

He made these for himself, and I very much doubt that he used machines (although he is comfortable doing so).

By contrast, George also made this saw, and I think that it was for Colonial Williamsburg ...

It is quite plain, and easily could have been made with a CNC machine.

Another example? At the top is the LN dovetail saw, and below it is the IT dovetail saw, which was the forerunner of the LN. There are notable differences in details when viewed close up (by someone looking for them). But I imagine both were made by hand ... ?

Here is a handle of mine. Can you tell what tools I used?

:)

Regards from Perth

Derek

Messages In This Thread

What makes the "handtool" look?
What is the objective
Re: I don't really know
If you can't design then copy
Re: That is a line...
Re: If you can't design then copy
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Edit: incomplete thought.
Chamfers on rails and styles
comment
This is a line of thought often
Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Adam's goal, as expressed to me
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: comment
Re: comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Disagree
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment
printing..
Re: comment
I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm wondering ...
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Not what I see *PIC*
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment (touchy feely alert)
ditto for turning
Re: Tempted
Re: Tempted
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Easy question
Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
A Riff on Derek's ideas
Re: we do it for ourselves
Re: we do it for ourselves - Nietzsche nailed it
Thanks Todd. *NM*
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Amish
Saw handles
Re: Saw handles
Easy... the eye of the beholder
You guys are way too negative
Perhaps...
Re: Perhaps...
Re: What makes the "handtool" look? Mistakes?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Thanks gentleman
Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Where was "why bother"?
What doesn't result in a hand tool look *PIC*
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Affectation Vs. Artifact
Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Affectation Vs. Artifact
You said it well *NM*
Sorry, didn't read your post very well
David Pye's thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts
Further thoughts
Re: Further thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts - Just not true though
ICBM gyros
Pye
© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081