Hand Tools Archive
Subject:
Interlocked grain *PIC*Response To:
Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four () Warren in Lancaster, PA
No, on the contrary, I conclude that higher cutting angle is an important requirement in achieving good performance on interlocked, hard woods. However, the chip breaker is also a factor in improving performance. It remains, however wood dependent.
I have been using the double iron for interlocked grain for more than 35 years. The double iron plane was designed for this type of work. A high angle plane is unnecessary.
Here is what Samuel Carruthers wrote in 1767:
Messages In This Thread
- Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Interlocked grain *PIC*
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Adding to the physics
- Re: Adding to the physics - a touch of commonsense
- Re: Adding to the physics - a touch of commonsense
- Re: high angle vs low angle
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Adding to the physics - a touch of commonsense
- Adding to the physics
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Interlocked grain
- Interlocked grain *PIC*
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four
- Re: Chip breaker experiment: session four

